<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 172 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326058</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeals as no substantial question of law arose. The Assessee&#039;s argument that belated returns cannot be ignored without proper justification was accepted. The Court emphasized the mandatory nature of issuing a Section 143(2) notice before framing an assessment under Section 144 if the return is not accepted at face value. The parties were directed to bear their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2016 17:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422578" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 172 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326058</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeals as no substantial question of law arose. The Assessee&#039;s argument that belated returns cannot be ignored without proper justification was accepted. The Court emphasized the mandatory nature of issuing a Section 143(2) notice before framing an assessment under Section 144 if the return is not accepted at face value. The parties were directed to bear their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326058</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>