<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 170 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326056</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the entitlement to deduction under Section 80IB(10) of the Income Tax Act, supporting the deletion of penalty under Section 271(1)(c). The Tribunal found the construction in line with approved plans, completion certificates obtained, and no restriction on selling flats to the same family during the relevant assessment year. The penalty was deemed unwarranted as the deduction claim was based on interpretation and debatable issues, with the Tribunal&#039;s decision aiming for consistency and avoiding conflicting outcomes. The Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s stance on both issues, emphasizing the validity of the deduction claim and the reasoning behind the penalty deletion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2016 08:13:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422576" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 170 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326056</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the entitlement to deduction under Section 80IB(10) of the Income Tax Act, supporting the deletion of penalty under Section 271(1)(c). The Tribunal found the construction in line with approved plans, completion certificates obtained, and no restriction on selling flats to the same family during the relevant assessment year. The penalty was deemed unwarranted as the deduction claim was based on interpretation and debatable issues, with the Tribunal&#039;s decision aiming for consistency and avoiding conflicting outcomes. The Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s stance on both issues, emphasizing the validity of the deduction claim and the reasoning behind the penalty deletion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326056</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>