<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 1019 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180941</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the ITAT erred in disallowing the benefit under Section 10B of the Income Tax Act. The Court found that the appellant&#039;s activities, involving the processing of marble slabs and tiles, constituted manufacturing as per the Supreme Court&#039;s precedent. The Court also addressed the denial of benefit under Section 80HHC, which was not pursued further by the appellant due to minimal financial impact and the absence of an appeal from the revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2018 11:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422534" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 1019 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180941</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the ITAT erred in disallowing the benefit under Section 10B of the Income Tax Act. The Court found that the appellant&#039;s activities, involving the processing of marble slabs and tiles, constituted manufacturing as per the Supreme Court&#039;s precedent. The Court also addressed the denial of benefit under Section 80HHC, which was not pursued further by the appellant due to minimal financial impact and the absence of an appeal from the revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180941</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>