<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 1198 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180936</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT&#039;s order directing the AO to re-examine the assessee&#039;s claim for deduction u/s 80IB(10) and verify compliance with specified conditions. The appeal was allowed in part, with instructions for further verification by the AO regarding ownership of land, approval of the housing project, classification as developer or contractor, and compliance with project conditions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2016 17:09:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422523" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 1198 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180936</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT&#039;s order directing the AO to re-examine the assessee&#039;s claim for deduction u/s 80IB(10) and verify compliance with specified conditions. The appeal was allowed in part, with instructions for further verification by the AO regarding ownership of land, approval of the housing project, classification as developer or contractor, and compliance with project conditions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180936</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>