<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 968 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180933</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that the doctrine of unjust enrichment did not apply to redemption fine and penalty in the case involving the classification of imported goods as photocopiers. The matter was remanded to the original adjudicating authority for a fresh decision solely on the duty aspect, excluding redemption fine and penalty. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 May 2016 16:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422521" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 968 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180933</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that the doctrine of unjust enrichment did not apply to redemption fine and penalty in the case involving the classification of imported goods as photocopiers. The matter was remanded to the original adjudicating authority for a fresh decision solely on the duty aspect, excluding redemption fine and penalty. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180933</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>