<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 1649 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180914</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the tax appeal, ruling against the Revenue on both issues. The Court upheld the tribunal&#039;s findings regarding the treatment of value received as cum duty and the provision of a reduced penalty option upon timely payment of duty, interest, and penalty. The matter was remanded to the original adjudicating authority for reworking the duty liability and quantifying interest, while allowing the option to pay reduced penalty within 30 days.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2017 11:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422498" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 1649 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180914</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the tax appeal, ruling against the Revenue on both issues. The Court upheld the tribunal&#039;s findings regarding the treatment of value received as cum duty and the provision of a reduced penalty option upon timely payment of duty, interest, and penalty. The matter was remanded to the original adjudicating authority for reworking the duty liability and quantifying interest, while allowing the option to pay reduced penalty within 30 days.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180914</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>