<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 1032 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180904</link>
    <description>In ITA No. 315/JU/2009 for Assessment Year 2006-07, the Tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision to disallow higher depreciation rates on dumpers, considering them as construction equipment rather than transport vehicles. In ITA No. 438/JU/2012, the Tribunal remanded the issue of tankers back to the AO for fresh consideration due to jurisdictional concerns and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision allowing higher depreciation on windmill components.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2016 14:42:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422486" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 1032 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180904</link>
      <description>In ITA No. 315/JU/2009 for Assessment Year 2006-07, the Tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision to disallow higher depreciation rates on dumpers, considering them as construction equipment rather than transport vehicles. In ITA No. 438/JU/2012, the Tribunal remanded the issue of tankers back to the AO for fresh consideration due to jurisdictional concerns and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision allowing higher depreciation on windmill components.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180904</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>