https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180903 Pay differentiation between trained and untrained teachers was upheld because training was treated as a relevant educational qualification and an intelligible basis for separate treatment; the doctrine of equal pay for equal work did not invalidate the classification. The special Schedule in the Rajasthan Civil Services (New Pay Scales) Rules, 1969 was held to prevail over the general increment rule in Rule 29 of the Rajasthan Services Rules, 1951, because the specific provision governing untrained teachers controlled any inconsistency with the general rule. The challenge to the pay fixation was rejected. en-us Tue, 07 Apr 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 Apr 2016 14:40:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180903 Pay differentiation between trained and untrained teachers was upheld because training was treated as a relevant educational qualification and an intelligible basis for separate treatment; the doctrine of equal pay for equal work did not invalidate the classification. The special Schedule in the Rajasthan Civil Services (New Pay Scales) Rules, 1969 was held to prevail over the general increment rule in Rule 29 of the Rajasthan Services Rules, 1951, because the specific provision governing untrained teachers controlled any inconsistency with the general rule. The challenge to the pay fixation was rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 07 Apr 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180903