<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 832 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180899</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that Rule 8D is not retrospective and cannot be applied for the relevant assessment year. Disallowance of administrative expenses can only be made if a direct nexus is established, which was not done in this case. Therefore, the addition made by the AO and enhanced by the CIT(A) was deleted, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2016 14:20:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422480" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 832 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180899</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that Rule 8D is not retrospective and cannot be applied for the relevant assessment year. Disallowance of administrative expenses can only be made if a direct nexus is established, which was not done in this case. Therefore, the addition made by the AO and enhanced by the CIT(A) was deleted, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180899</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>