<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 1188 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180887</link>
    <description>CHA services used before export of goods were treated as input services under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, where the exports were on FOB basis and the relevant clarification linked the place of removal to transfer of ownership. On that reasoning, services connected with export handling and the movement of final products to the port area were held to fall within the scope of eligible input services. Refund of the service tax paid on such CHA services was therefore admissible, and credit was allowed in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 May 2017 09:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422450" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 1188 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180887</link>
      <description>CHA services used before export of goods were treated as input services under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, where the exports were on FOB basis and the relevant clarification linked the place of removal to transfer of ownership. On that reasoning, services connected with export handling and the movement of final products to the port area were held to fall within the scope of eligible input services. Refund of the service tax paid on such CHA services was therefore admissible, and credit was allowed in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180887</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>