<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (10) TMI 19 - HIGH COURT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2892</link>
    <description>The Court set aside both the Assessing Officer and Tribunal&#039;s orders, remanding the matter for the correct computation of undisclosed income. The Court emphasized the need for corroborative evidence beyond seized documents and highlighted the importance of considering actual receipts and tax payments. The appeals were disposed of accordingly, directing a reassessment by the Assessing Officer in compliance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42245" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (10) TMI 19 - HIGH COURT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2892</link>
      <description>The Court set aside both the Assessing Officer and Tribunal&#039;s orders, remanding the matter for the correct computation of undisclosed income. The Court emphasized the need for corroborative evidence beyond seized documents and highlighted the importance of considering actual receipts and tax payments. The appeals were disposed of accordingly, directing a reassessment by the Assessing Officer in compliance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2892</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>