<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 638 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180885</link>
    <description>The court clarified the applicability of Section 117 of the Finance Act, 2000, regarding Service Tax demands for specific periods. It upheld the decision in Appeal No. 9/2004, dismissing the challenge against interest levy. However, it set aside the decision in Appeal No. 12/2004, allowing the appeal against the demand for Service Tax for the period 17-10-1998 to 31-8-1999, ruling that recipients were not liable beyond 16-10-1998.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2016 10:41:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422448" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 638 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180885</link>
      <description>The court clarified the applicability of Section 117 of the Finance Act, 2000, regarding Service Tax demands for specific periods. It upheld the decision in Appeal No. 9/2004, dismissing the challenge against interest levy. However, it set aside the decision in Appeal No. 12/2004, allowing the appeal against the demand for Service Tax for the period 17-10-1998 to 31-8-1999, ruling that recipients were not liable beyond 16-10-1998.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180885</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>