<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (6) TMI 623 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180878</link>
    <description>Preventive detention requires a live and proximate nexus with the alleged prejudicial conduct, and unexplained delay in issuing or executing the order can vitiate detention. The Court also held that a detenu&#039;s representation must be considered promptly with real application of mind, and that merely informing the detenu of rejection without communicating the actual order breaches constitutional safeguards. On the facts, the delay in issuing the detention order, the delayed and insufficient disposal of representations, the defective communication of rejection, and the unexplained delay in execution all undermined the detention order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 May 2016 18:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422439" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (6) TMI 623 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180878</link>
      <description>Preventive detention requires a live and proximate nexus with the alleged prejudicial conduct, and unexplained delay in issuing or executing the order can vitiate detention. The Court also held that a detenu&#039;s representation must be considered promptly with real application of mind, and that merely informing the detenu of rejection without communicating the actual order breaches constitutional safeguards. On the facts, the delay in issuing the detention order, the delayed and insufficient disposal of representations, the defective communication of rejection, and the unexplained delay in execution all undermined the detention order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180878</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>