https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180864 The Court dismissed the writ petition seeking to quash the Ext.P12 order without prejudice to the petitioner's right to pursue the statutory remedy by way of appeal, as confirmed by previous decisions and the law declared in Metal Weld Electrodes v. CESTAT, Chennai. The consideration of the Restoration Application Ext.P9 would be subject to the pursuit of the statutory remedy by way of appeal. The judgment emphasized the availability of a statutory remedy by way of appeal, allowing the petitioner to proceed in accordance with the law while preserving the right to appeal. en-us Thu, 13 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 Apr 2016 09:13:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180864 The Court dismissed the writ petition seeking to quash the Ext.P12 order without prejudice to the petitioner's right to pursue the statutory remedy by way of appeal, as confirmed by previous decisions and the law declared in Metal Weld Electrodes v. CESTAT, Chennai. The consideration of the Restoration Application Ext.P9 would be subject to the pursuit of the statutory remedy by way of appeal. The judgment emphasized the availability of a statutory remedy by way of appeal, allowing the petitioner to proceed in accordance with the law while preserving the right to appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 13 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180864