<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 132 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326018</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, criticizing the Assessing Officer&#039;s conduct for failing to acknowledge the petitioner&#039;s stay application promptly. The court directed the application to be handled by the Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, emphasizing the importance of fair treatment and timely acknowledgment of applications. The petition was disposed of with no costs, ensuring justice by assigning the application to a different Officer for a fair decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 May 2016 18:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422413" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 132 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326018</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, criticizing the Assessing Officer&#039;s conduct for failing to acknowledge the petitioner&#039;s stay application promptly. The court directed the application to be handled by the Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, emphasizing the importance of fair treatment and timely acknowledgment of applications. The petition was disposed of with no costs, ensuring justice by assigning the application to a different Officer for a fair decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326018</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>