<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 119 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326005</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the Revenue&#039;s application of Rule 8D(2)(ii) and 8D(2)(iii) for disallowance computation, subject to adjustments for interest on FDRs. The tribunal confirmed the statutory prescription for disallowing indirect administrative expenses under Rule 8D(2)(iii). The assessee&#039;s appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with adjustments as directed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2016 09:11:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422400" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 119 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326005</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the Revenue&#039;s application of Rule 8D(2)(ii) and 8D(2)(iii) for disallowance computation, subject to adjustments for interest on FDRs. The tribunal confirmed the statutory prescription for disallowing indirect administrative expenses under Rule 8D(2)(iii). The assessee&#039;s appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with adjustments as directed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326005</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>