<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 103 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325989</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant on all issues except for Cenvat credit on insurance services related to goods beyond the place of removal. The case was remanded for recomputation of demand, interest, and penalty specifically related to insurance services beyond the place of removal, with the penalty to be revised accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 May 2016 11:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422384" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 103 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325989</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant on all issues except for Cenvat credit on insurance services related to goods beyond the place of removal. The case was remanded for recomputation of demand, interest, and penalty specifically related to insurance services beyond the place of removal, with the penalty to be revised accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325989</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>