<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 102 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325988</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed by remand, emphasizing the importance of considering relevant judicial decisions in the denial of credit on specific items under the Cenvat Credit Rules. The Member highlighted the necessity of a thorough examination of legal precedents before reaching a final determination, reaffirming the appellant&#039;s right to a fair hearing for a just and comprehensive review of the dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2016 08:59:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422383" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 102 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325988</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed by remand, emphasizing the importance of considering relevant judicial decisions in the denial of credit on specific items under the Cenvat Credit Rules. The Member highlighted the necessity of a thorough examination of legal precedents before reaching a final determination, reaffirming the appellant&#039;s right to a fair hearing for a just and comprehensive review of the dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325988</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>