<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (4) TMI 58 - HIGH COURT, PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2884</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions in favor of the assessee on various issues including allowing depreciation on Electric Installations in Fully Fashioned Unit, granting extra shift allowance on specific units, permitting depreciation on Generator and Electric Transformers, classifying Refinery Units as &#039;Industrial Undertakings&#039; for Investment Allowance, allowing Investment Allowance on specific electric installations, and approving the claim for &#039;Leave with Wages&#039;. The Court relied on legal principles and precedents to support its rulings, consistently favoring the assessee in each instance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 07:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42237" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (4) TMI 58 - HIGH COURT, PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2884</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions in favor of the assessee on various issues including allowing depreciation on Electric Installations in Fully Fashioned Unit, granting extra shift allowance on specific units, permitting depreciation on Generator and Electric Transformers, classifying Refinery Units as &#039;Industrial Undertakings&#039; for Investment Allowance, allowing Investment Allowance on specific electric installations, and approving the claim for &#039;Leave with Wages&#039;. The Court relied on legal principles and precedents to support its rulings, consistently favoring the assessee in each instance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2884</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>