<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 831 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180851</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals, annulling the assessment under section 153C due to insufficient satisfaction regarding undisclosed income. It directed the rental income to be classified as business income instead of income from house property and permitted the claimed expenses as deductions. The decision highlighted the significance of correct jurisdiction and procedural compliance in tax assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Apr 2023 13:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422359" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 831 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180851</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals, annulling the assessment under section 153C due to insufficient satisfaction regarding undisclosed income. It directed the rental income to be classified as business income instead of income from house property and permitted the claimed expenses as deductions. The decision highlighted the significance of correct jurisdiction and procedural compliance in tax assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180851</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>