<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (1) TMI 343 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180848</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a ban on business dealings with Indian Railways for three years. The Court found the ban justified due to discrepancies in work test certificates provided by the firm. It held that principles of natural justice were observed, rejecting claims of malafide action. The Court concluded that there was sufficient evidence supporting the ban, ruling in favor of the respondents and dismissing the petition with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 May 2016 18:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422350" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (1) TMI 343 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180848</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a ban on business dealings with Indian Railways for three years. The Court found the ban justified due to discrepancies in work test certificates provided by the firm. It held that principles of natural justice were observed, rejecting claims of malafide action. The Court concluded that there was sufficient evidence supporting the ban, ruling in favor of the respondents and dismissing the petition with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180848</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>