https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325976 Product approval disputes falling under the applicable food code should first be examined by the competent authority on the relevant materials, before judicial interference is sought. The Madras HC did not set aside the rejection on merits; instead, it directed the petitioner to make a fresh application with supporting scientific material for consideration under Clause 14(2) of the Indian Food Code. The authority was required to examine the request within six weeks, and the contention that the alcoholic content was below 1% was left open for that administrative determination. No immediate relief against the rejection was granted. en-us Tue, 03 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Apr 2016 15:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325976 Product approval disputes falling under the applicable food code should first be examined by the competent authority on the relevant materials, before judicial interference is sought. The Madras HC did not set aside the rejection on merits; instead, it directed the petitioner to make a fresh application with supporting scientific material for consideration under Clause 14(2) of the Indian Food Code. The authority was required to examine the request within six weeks, and the contention that the alcoholic content was below 1% was left open for that administrative determination. No immediate relief against the rejection was granted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 03 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325976