<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (9) TMI 89 - HIGH COURT, GUJARAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2879</link>
    <description>The High Court held that a question of law arose regarding the ownership of gold ornaments and jewelry found in the assessee&#039;s locker, directing the Tribunal to refer the question. Despite the assessee&#039;s claim that the items belonged to directors or relatives, the Assessing Officer included their value in the assessee&#039;s income. The Court upheld the lower authorities&#039; decisions, finding no basis to interfere, resulting in a ruling in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee, with no costs incurred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 08:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42232" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (9) TMI 89 - HIGH COURT, GUJARAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2879</link>
      <description>The High Court held that a question of law arose regarding the ownership of gold ornaments and jewelry found in the assessee&#039;s locker, directing the Tribunal to refer the question. Despite the assessee&#039;s claim that the items belonged to directors or relatives, the Assessing Officer included their value in the assessee&#039;s income. The Court upheld the lower authorities&#039; decisions, finding no basis to interfere, resulting in a ruling in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee, with no costs incurred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2879</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>