<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 704 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180831</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, determining that expenses on advertisement, including those related to an ad-film featuring a celebrity, were not subject to Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT) as they fell within the exclusions outlined in sec. 115WB(2)(D). Consequently, the Tribunal overturned the AO&#039;s addition, leading to a reduction in the assessed value of fringe benefits. The decision was rendered in Open Court on 25th November 2011.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2016 12:52:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422312" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 704 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180831</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, determining that expenses on advertisement, including those related to an ad-film featuring a celebrity, were not subject to Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT) as they fell within the exclusions outlined in sec. 115WB(2)(D). Consequently, the Tribunal overturned the AO&#039;s addition, leading to a reduction in the assessed value of fringe benefits. The decision was rendered in Open Court on 25th November 2011.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180831</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>