<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 1107 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180823</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal as there was no substantial question of law. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was upheld, emphasizing the importance of thorough verification by assessing officers. The Court found no evidence supporting the revenue&#039;s claims of illegitimacy in loans received, share capital allotment, and share application money. The judgment stressed the need for proper investigation to establish the authenticity of financial transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2016 11:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422304" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 1107 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180823</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal as there was no substantial question of law. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was upheld, emphasizing the importance of thorough verification by assessing officers. The Court found no evidence supporting the revenue&#039;s claims of illegitimacy in loans received, share capital allotment, and share application money. The judgment stressed the need for proper investigation to establish the authenticity of financial transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180823</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>