<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 1167 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180821</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ordered ICCONOL Petroleums Private Limited to make specified payments and provide a bank guarantee within a set period. Upon compliance, the impugned order would be set aside, and the appeals remanded back to the Adjudicating Authority for fresh orders, ensuring procedural fairness and compliance with natural justice principles. The appeals were remanded for de novo decision, and stay petitions were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2016 11:40:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422301" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 1167 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180821</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ordered ICCONOL Petroleums Private Limited to make specified payments and provide a bank guarantee within a set period. Upon compliance, the impugned order would be set aside, and the appeals remanded back to the Adjudicating Authority for fresh orders, ensuring procedural fairness and compliance with natural justice principles. The appeals were remanded for de novo decision, and stay petitions were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180821</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>