<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 1014 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180809</link>
    <description>Mixtures of spices marketed as masala powders retained classification under Chapter 9 because they continued to bear the essential character of spices despite minor additions such as salt, rice powder, dal powder and preservatives. Chapter Note 1 and Supplementary Note 3 to Chapter 9, read with the Chapter 21 exclusion, required Revenue to show that the added ingredients were of such nature and quantity that the products had become mixed condiments, mixed seasonings or edible preparations. On the record, that evidentiary burden was not met, so the Chapter 21 classification failed. The duty demand and consequential penalties were therefore set aside, and the assessees obtained relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 10:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422294" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 1014 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180809</link>
      <description>Mixtures of spices marketed as masala powders retained classification under Chapter 9 because they continued to bear the essential character of spices despite minor additions such as salt, rice powder, dal powder and preservatives. Chapter Note 1 and Supplementary Note 3 to Chapter 9, read with the Chapter 21 exclusion, required Revenue to show that the added ingredients were of such nature and quantity that the products had become mixed condiments, mixed seasonings or edible preparations. On the record, that evidentiary burden was not met, so the Chapter 21 classification failed. The duty demand and consequential penalties were therefore set aside, and the assessees obtained relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180809</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>