https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180810 The Tribunal upheld the appellant's cash refund claim for unutilized Cenvat credit from July 2007 to September 2007, emphasizing that the date of export for refund purposes is the date of the "let export" order. The Tribunal deemed the failure to initially submit customs-certified shipping bills as a remediable defect and ruled that a substantive claim should not be denied for minor procedural violations. The Tribunal overturned the CCE (Appeals) decision, granting the appeal and highlighting that procedural grounds should not impede valid refund claims. en-us Thu, 11 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 May 2016 14:34:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180810 The Tribunal upheld the appellant's cash refund claim for unutilized Cenvat credit from July 2007 to September 2007, emphasizing that the date of export for refund purposes is the date of the "let export" order. The Tribunal deemed the failure to initially submit customs-certified shipping bills as a remediable defect and ruled that a substantive claim should not be denied for minor procedural violations. The Tribunal overturned the CCE (Appeals) decision, granting the appeal and highlighting that procedural grounds should not impede valid refund claims. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 11 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180810