https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180811 The case involved appeals by the assessee and the Revenue regarding disputed services and Cenvat credit eligibility. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing Cenvat credit for services like medical group insurance and consultancy, despite the Revenue's argument on advertisement services. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of specific allegations in the show cause notice and ordered a remand for further evidence production. The second appeal by the Revenue was rejected, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals)'s decision on service credit eligibility based on legal precedents. Overall, the appeals were disposed of with an emphasis on adherence to legal principles and evidence presentation. en-us Tue, 28 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 May 2016 11:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180811 The case involved appeals by the assessee and the Revenue regarding disputed services and Cenvat credit eligibility. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing Cenvat credit for services like medical group insurance and consultancy, despite the Revenue's argument on advertisement services. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of specific allegations in the show cause notice and ordered a remand for further evidence production. The second appeal by the Revenue was rejected, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals)'s decision on service credit eligibility based on legal precedents. Overall, the appeals were disposed of with an emphasis on adherence to legal principles and evidence presentation. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 28 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180811