https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325975 The High Court upheld the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax's order requiring the petitioner to deposit 50% of the disputed tax, with an additional 30% to be deposited by a revised deadline due to delays in the First Appeal process. The Court directed the Commissioner of Income Tax to promptly decide the First Appeal and restrained coercive measures until the revised deadline, emphasizing timely deposit and cooperation in the appeal process. The judgment did not assess the merits of the First Appeal, leaving it to the Appellate Authority's discretion. en-us Thu, 31 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Apr 2016 14:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325975 The High Court upheld the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax's order requiring the petitioner to deposit 50% of the disputed tax, with an additional 30% to be deposited by a revised deadline due to delays in the First Appeal process. The Court directed the Commissioner of Income Tax to promptly decide the First Appeal and restrained coercive measures until the revised deadline, emphasizing timely deposit and cooperation in the appeal process. The judgment did not assess the merits of the First Appeal, leaving it to the Appellate Authority's discretion. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 31 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325975