<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 84 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325970</link>
    <description>The ITAT concluded that the additional fees collected should be assessed in the hands of Shri K.T. Mahi, not the Society. The disallowances under Section 40(a)(ia) were deleted, and the extrapolation of income for earlier years was not justified without cogent material. The appeals of the assessee were allowed, and the assessment orders were modified accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2016 13:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422279" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 84 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325970</link>
      <description>The ITAT concluded that the additional fees collected should be assessed in the hands of Shri K.T. Mahi, not the Society. The disallowances under Section 40(a)(ia) were deleted, and the extrapolation of income for earlier years was not justified without cogent material. The appeals of the assessee were allowed, and the assessment orders were modified accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325970</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>