<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 77 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325963</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, directing the Assessing Officer to determine the Fair Market Value of the property in accordance with Section 50C(2) by considering the prevailing rate in 2005. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of valuing the property based on the initial agreement and payments received. The judgment was pronounced on 12th February 2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2016 10:43:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422272" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 77 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325963</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, directing the Assessing Officer to determine the Fair Market Value of the property in accordance with Section 50C(2) by considering the prevailing rate in 2005. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of valuing the property based on the initial agreement and payments received. The judgment was pronounced on 12th February 2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325963</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>