<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 76 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325962</link>
    <description>The tribunal set aside the order passed by the CIT (Exemptions) under Section 263, as it was deemed not erroneous or prejudicial to the revenue. The tribunal found that the AO had conducted proper inquiries and made decisions in line with permissible views, leading to the allowance of the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2016 10:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422271" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 76 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325962</link>
      <description>The tribunal set aside the order passed by the CIT (Exemptions) under Section 263, as it was deemed not erroneous or prejudicial to the revenue. The tribunal found that the AO had conducted proper inquiries and made decisions in line with permissible views, leading to the allowance of the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325962</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>