<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 74 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325960</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to restrict the additions made by the AO. The Tribunal found that the additions lacked evidentiary support as they were based on surrendered amounts retracted by the assessee, and not on any incriminating evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2016 13:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422269" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 74 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325960</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to restrict the additions made by the AO. The Tribunal found that the additions lacked evidentiary support as they were based on surrendered amounts retracted by the assessee, and not on any incriminating evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325960</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>