<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 69 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325955</link>
    <description>The court expressed dissatisfaction with the lack of compliance with its orders regarding the auction of Aircraft. It emphasized the need for technical expertise and criticized the inaction of the authorities responsible for the auction. The court directed the Commissioner to engage expert entities like Air India and M/s.Air Work Engineering Pvt.Ltd. for the auction process, instructing immediate action and reporting back within three weeks. The court clarified that its order did not relax any terms and conditions, instructing communication of the order to relevant authorities. The case was scheduled for further consideration after three weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2016 10:40:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422264" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 69 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325955</link>
      <description>The court expressed dissatisfaction with the lack of compliance with its orders regarding the auction of Aircraft. It emphasized the need for technical expertise and criticized the inaction of the authorities responsible for the auction. The court directed the Commissioner to engage expert entities like Air India and M/s.Air Work Engineering Pvt.Ltd. for the auction process, instructing immediate action and reporting back within three weeks. The court clarified that its order did not relax any terms and conditions, instructing communication of the order to relevant authorities. The case was scheduled for further consideration after three weeks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325955</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>