<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 58 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325944</link>
    <description>In job-work valuation of processed fabrics, the assessable value includes the grey fabric cost, job charges, and the processor&#039;s manufacturing profit and expenses, but excludes the trader&#039;s post-manufacturing profit and subsequent selling expenses. Applying Ujagar Prints, the text states that cutting, checking and packing charges were not shown by the Revenue to fall outside the declared job charges, and the respondent&#039;s filed declarations remained unchallenged. On that basis, the trader&#039;s profit and post-processing expenses were not includible in assessable value, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed; the discussion also notes that extended limitation was not attracted on the existing record.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2017 11:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422252" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 58 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325944</link>
      <description>In job-work valuation of processed fabrics, the assessable value includes the grey fabric cost, job charges, and the processor&#039;s manufacturing profit and expenses, but excludes the trader&#039;s post-manufacturing profit and subsequent selling expenses. Applying Ujagar Prints, the text states that cutting, checking and packing charges were not shown by the Revenue to fall outside the declared job charges, and the respondent&#039;s filed declarations remained unchallenged. On that basis, the trader&#039;s profit and post-processing expenses were not includible in assessable value, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed; the discussion also notes that extended limitation was not attracted on the existing record.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325944</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>