https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325935 Revisional orders sustaining denial of turnover discount under the Central Sales Tax framework were set aside because the revisional authority did not independently consider the assessee's objections. The authority had proceeded mainly on an earlier judgment and failed to address the contention that Karnataka Value Added Tax Rules, including Rule 3(2)(c), could not be applied for determining turnover under the Central Sales Tax Act. As the objections were not examined on merits, the order could not stand. The matter was remanded to the revisional authority for fresh consideration in accordance with law. en-us Tue, 09 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 31 Mar 2016 15:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325935 Revisional orders sustaining denial of turnover discount under the Central Sales Tax framework were set aside because the revisional authority did not independently consider the assessee's objections. The authority had proceeded mainly on an earlier judgment and failed to address the contention that Karnataka Value Added Tax Rules, including Rule 3(2)(c), could not be applied for determining turnover under the Central Sales Tax Act. As the objections were not examined on merits, the order could not stand. The matter was remanded to the revisional authority for fresh consideration in accordance with law. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 09 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325935