<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (12) TMI 76 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2870</link>
    <description>SC affirmed lower tribunals and HC in rejecting a deduction claimed under section 32AB. The taxpayer failed to produce any material demonstrating entitlement to the deduction and did not satisfy statutory requirements, including engaging in the requisite manufacturing activity. Consequently, the claimed deduction under section 32AB was disallowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2025 10:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42223" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (12) TMI 76 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2870</link>
      <description>SC affirmed lower tribunals and HC in rejecting a deduction claimed under section 32AB. The taxpayer failed to produce any material demonstrating entitlement to the deduction and did not satisfy statutory requirements, including engaging in the requisite manufacturing activity. Consequently, the claimed deduction under section 32AB was disallowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2870</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>