https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180785 In an appeal against acquittal, interference is justified only on compelling and substantial grounds, and where two reasonable views are possible the view favouring the accused must prevail. The prosecution case was found doubtful because the identity of the dead body was not established with certainty, the principal eyewitness was unreliable, the child witness appeared tutored, and delays, inconsistencies in the FIR and seizure, and non-examination of a material witness weakened the evidence. The High Court's assessment was not shown to be perverse or infirm, so the acquittal was left undisturbed and the appeal failed. en-us Wed, 05 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 12 Jan 2024 14:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180785 In an appeal against acquittal, interference is justified only on compelling and substantial grounds, and where two reasonable views are possible the view favouring the accused must prevail. The prosecution case was found doubtful because the identity of the dead body was not established with certainty, the principal eyewitness was unreliable, the child witness appeared tutored, and delays, inconsistencies in the FIR and seizure, and non-examination of a material witness weakened the evidence. The High Court's assessment was not shown to be perverse or infirm, so the acquittal was left undisturbed and the appeal failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 05 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180785