<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (9) TMI 112 - HIGH COURT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2865</link>
    <description>The Court found the writ petition challenging a service tax demand premature and not maintainable at that stage. It held that the petitioner could challenge the proceedings in the future when issued, disposing of the petition without costs and allowing the petitioner to revisit the matter when appropriate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 15:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42218" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (9) TMI 112 - HIGH COURT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2865</link>
      <description>The Court found the writ petition challenging a service tax demand premature and not maintainable at that stage. It held that the petitioner could challenge the proceedings in the future when issued, disposing of the petition without costs and allowing the petitioner to revisit the matter when appropriate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2865</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>