<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 756 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180774</link>
    <description>The HC of Calcutta allowed a delay condonation application of 127 days, citing sufficient cause. Regarding the computation of profit under Section 80IA, the court sided with the assessee, agreeing that receipts for captively consumed power should be based on the purchase rate from the Board, as accepted by the CIT(A). On the interpretation of market value for surplus power, the Tribunal determined that the transfer price should reflect the market value, supported by previous decisions. As the law was settled by earlier judgments, the HC dismissed the appeal, finding no substantial question of law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2023 14:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422164" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 756 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180774</link>
      <description>The HC of Calcutta allowed a delay condonation application of 127 days, citing sufficient cause. Regarding the computation of profit under Section 80IA, the court sided with the assessee, agreeing that receipts for captively consumed power should be based on the purchase rate from the Board, as accepted by the CIT(A). On the interpretation of market value for surplus power, the Tribunal determined that the transfer price should reflect the market value, supported by previous decisions. As the law was settled by earlier judgments, the HC dismissed the appeal, finding no substantial question of law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180774</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>