<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 42 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325928</link>
    <description>The court allowed the appeals filed by the Revenue, setting aside the orders passed by the ITAT and confirming the orders of the First Appellate Authority. The appeals filed by the assessee were dismissed, and the court held that the Tribunal&#039;s interpretation of Section 40(a)(ia) was incorrect. The court emphasized that non-compliance with statutory obligations has consequences, and ignorance of law is not an excuse.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 May 2016 18:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422136" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 42 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325928</link>
      <description>The court allowed the appeals filed by the Revenue, setting aside the orders passed by the ITAT and confirming the orders of the First Appellate Authority. The appeals filed by the assessee were dismissed, and the court held that the Tribunal&#039;s interpretation of Section 40(a)(ia) was incorrect. The court emphasized that non-compliance with statutory obligations has consequences, and ignorance of law is not an excuse.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325928</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>