<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 40 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325926</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessee for both assessment years, holding that the assessee is entitled to claim additional depreciation under section 32(1)(iia) of the Income Tax Act. The judgment emphasized that the manufacturing of pipes, even if part of the larger business operation, qualifies as a manufacturing activity eligible for additional depreciation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2016 11:12:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422134" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 40 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325926</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessee for both assessment years, holding that the assessee is entitled to claim additional depreciation under section 32(1)(iia) of the Income Tax Act. The judgment emphasized that the manufacturing of pipes, even if part of the larger business operation, qualifies as a manufacturing activity eligible for additional depreciation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325926</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>