<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 1086 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180746</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that penalties under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 could be imposed on firms and companies, including the appellants. The appellants were directed to deposit 50% of the penalties imposed to proceed with their appeals due to their involvement in clandestine activities and legal precedents supporting such penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2016 11:08:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422117" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 1086 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180746</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that penalties under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 could be imposed on firms and companies, including the appellants. The appellants were directed to deposit 50% of the penalties imposed to proceed with their appeals due to their involvement in clandestine activities and legal precedents supporting such penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180746</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>