<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 1010 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180750</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the availed Cenvat credit on imported scrap and fraudulent Cenvat credit on re-rollable scrap. The demand for the shortage of inputs was set aside due to credible explanations provided by the assessee. Additionally, the denial of Cenvat credit on re-rollable material was overturned as the Revenue failed to provide sufficient evidence of diversion. The Tribunal confirmed a reduced demand against the assessee, imposed penalties, but did not penalize the Director and Excise In-charge. The Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2016 11:08:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422113" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 1010 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180750</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the availed Cenvat credit on imported scrap and fraudulent Cenvat credit on re-rollable scrap. The demand for the shortage of inputs was set aside due to credible explanations provided by the assessee. Additionally, the denial of Cenvat credit on re-rollable material was overturned as the Revenue failed to provide sufficient evidence of diversion. The Tribunal confirmed a reduced demand against the assessee, imposed penalties, but did not penalize the Director and Excise In-charge. The Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180750</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>