<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 1026 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180753</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, allowing the stay petition unconditionally. The decision was influenced by previous judgments where similar evidence was deemed insufficient to deny Cenvat credit. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of consistency in judicial decisions, particularly when higher courts have ruled on analogous matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2016 11:08:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422110" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 1026 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180753</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, allowing the stay petition unconditionally. The decision was influenced by previous judgments where similar evidence was deemed insufficient to deny Cenvat credit. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of consistency in judicial decisions, particularly when higher courts have ruled on analogous matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180753</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>