<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 1265 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180734</link>
    <description>A writ petition challenging a tax-related representation was disposed of after counsel stated that the representation had already been decided. The petitioner also informed the court that a separate writ petition had been filed against the order passed on that representation, so the present petition was no longer pressed and was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2016 11:01:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422087" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 1265 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180734</link>
      <description>A writ petition challenging a tax-related representation was disposed of after counsel stated that the representation had already been decided. The petitioner also informed the court that a separate writ petition had been filed against the order passed on that representation, so the present petition was no longer pressed and was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180734</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>