<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 1096 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180736</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the respondents, holding that they wrongly paid duty on scrap generated during manufacturing and were entitled to the refund claim. The Tribunal found that duty was not required on scrap from job workers, and the respondents demonstrated the absence of unjust enrichment through a balance sheet and C.A. certificate. Consequently, the Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, affirming the respondents&#039; entitlement to the refund claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2016 11:01:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422085" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 1096 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180736</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the respondents, holding that they wrongly paid duty on scrap generated during manufacturing and were entitled to the refund claim. The Tribunal found that duty was not required on scrap from job workers, and the respondents demonstrated the absence of unjust enrichment through a balance sheet and C.A. certificate. Consequently, the Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, affirming the respondents&#039; entitlement to the refund claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180736</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>