https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325897 In an appeal against acquittal in an NDPS prosecution, interference was limited to cases where the trial court's view was perverse or manifestly illegal; where two views were possible, the appellate court would not substitute its own. The prosecution failed to prove conscious possession and recovery beyond reasonable doubt because the evidence was deficient on the recovery chain, identification of the luggage trunk, witness consistency, sealing and custody of the case property, and other investigative lapses. The acquittal was therefore upheld and the respondent retained the benefit of doubt. en-us Tue, 29 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Apr 2016 10:55:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325897 In an appeal against acquittal in an NDPS prosecution, interference was limited to cases where the trial court's view was perverse or manifestly illegal; where two views were possible, the appellate court would not substitute its own. The prosecution failed to prove conscious possession and recovery beyond reasonable doubt because the evidence was deficient on the recovery chain, identification of the luggage trunk, witness consistency, sealing and custody of the case property, and other investigative lapses. The acquittal was therefore upheld and the respondent retained the benefit of doubt. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 29 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325897