<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 969 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180730</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that the income arising from the sale of shares, units, and securities through Portfolio Management Services should be assessed under the head of capital gains, contrary to the Assessing Officer&#039;s classification as business income. The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, directing the AO to consider the correct amount of income based on the evidence provided by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2016 10:52:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422068" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 969 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180730</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that the income arising from the sale of shares, units, and securities through Portfolio Management Services should be assessed under the head of capital gains, contrary to the Assessing Officer&#039;s classification as business income. The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, directing the AO to consider the correct amount of income based on the evidence provided by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180730</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>